Andhra Leaks Part 1 : Andhra State was Born in a Womb of Violence!

By Konatham Dileep


History, they say, has all the answers. But, the history books written by Seemandhra writers always contained half-truths. The fact that not many people outside AP know the difference between the two states – Andhra and Andhra Pradesh, shows how the history of this state was distorted. So effective were the distortions of Seemandhra historians that even the Justice Srikrishna Committee got confused between Andhra and Andhra Pradesh  states!

Every year, the Andhra Pradesh state government carries out full-page advertisements containing Gandhian Potti Sriramulu’s image on November 1st – the state formation day. The fact that Potti Sriramulu’s fast-unto-death was related to Andhra state and not Andhra Pradesh state is deliberately hidden.

Here is a piece of authentic history that helps us expose the double standards of Seemandhra leaders who constantly refer to Telangana statehood supporters as ‘Separatists’. If demanding a separate state amounts to ‘Separatism’, then our Seemandhra brothers can be safely called the first ‘Separatists’ of independent India.

Yes! After India got independence from the British in 1947, it was Telugu speaking people in the erstwhile Madras state who started the first statehood movement. And the reason why they wanted a separate state?

They felt that the Telugus were being discriminated by the Tamils!

The struggle for a separate Andhra state picked up momentum as soon as India got independent. The union government, under the leadership of Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru was initially sympathetic to the Andhra statehood struggle. But when the leaders of separate Andhra agitation staked their claim on Madras city, the statehood issue turned knotty.

This is when the Indian government started postponing the statehood issue citing lack of consensus!

Both Tamils and Telugus were not ready to compromise on the Madras city. To up the ante, Potti Sriramulu – a Gandhian undertook a fast-unto-death with a demand for creating Andhra state with Madras as its capital city.

(We shall discuss the conspiracy behind Potti Sriramulu’s death in part three.)

Jawaharlal agreed to declare Andhra state sans Madras city when Potti Sriramulu’s fast entered its 50th day. But for some weird reason, Sriramulu did not break his fast even then.

He died on 16th December 1952 – the 58 th day of his fast. And all hell broke loose.

The whole Andhra region burned for the next few days.

What Got Them a State? Violence or Sacrifice

History books in Andhra Pradesh and elsewhere tell us that Andhra state was formed due to the ‘sacrifice’ of Potti Sriramulu. But, a careful analyis of newspaper reports and published books tells us a completely different story.

Here’s what Time magazine wrote about what happened after Sriramulu’s death:

“A wave of hysterical emotion swept Andhra territory. Students, youths and workers, led by Communists, attacked Indian government property, cut telegraph wires, damaged railroads, burned rail cars and stoned fire engines, looted railroad restaurants, hoisted black flags of mourning over government buildings. Police, firing on rioters, killed seven and wounded forty. A 13-year-old boy attempted to halt a moving bus by standing in its path, and was run over and killed.

At week’s end Prime Minister Nehru, responding perhaps as much to the violence as to Sriramulu’s nonviolence, announced that his government had decided to establish Andhra state.”

Read these lines in the book “History of India” written by N Jayapalan



So, its the ‘rampant hysteria’ that ‘forced’ the Congress Central Government to concede Andhra!

A foreign newspaper – Daytona Beach Morning Journal carried this news item on Dec 17th 1952. It clearly explains what kind of arson, looting and violence followed Potti Sriramulu’s death.



I am sure you never heard that our Andhra brothers even looted trains as a part of their statehood struggle!

Andrew Simpson in his book “Language and national identity in Asia”  writes thus:
“Potti Sriramulu’s death after fifty-eight days of fasting, resulted in the occurence of widespread riots which forced the centre’s hand, and in October of the following year, India’s first linguistic state, Andhra, was formed”
Isn’t it clear how the unprecedented violence forced the centre’s hand in taking a call on the statehood issue?
Even in Telugu, several historians have clearly recorded what happened after Potti Sriramulu’s death.
ప్రొఫెసర్ ఎం. సత్యనారాయణ రావు గారు రచించిన “ఆంధ్ర ప్రదేశ్ రాజకీయాలు” అనే పుస్తకంలో
“ఆయన ఆత్మాహుతితో ఆంధ్ర ప్రజల ఉద్రేకానికి అడ్డు లేకుండా పోయింది. మూడు రోజుల పాటు ఆంధ్ర జిల్లాలలో ఎడతెగని దహనకాండ కొనసాగింది. అనేక చోట్ల పోలీసులు కాల్పులు జరిపారు” అని రాశారు.
ఇక బి.ఎన్. శాస్త్రి గారు “ఆంధ్రదేశ చరిత్ర – సంస్కృతి” పుస్తకం పేజీ 576 లో ఇలా పేర్కొన్నారు.
“టెలిఫోన్ తీగలు స్థాన భ్రష్టత పొందెను. రైలు పట్టాలు తొలగింపబడెను. కార్యాలయములు అగ్నికాహుతి యయ్యెను. ఈ పరిస్థితులలో గత్యంతరము లేక నిర్వివాద ప్రాంతములతో ఆంధ్ర రాష్ట్రమేర్పడునని ప్రకటించెను”
The spate of violent incidents that led to the declaration of Andhra state evoked strong reactions from political leaders of that era.
Acharya J B Kriplani, Praja Socialist Leader, said

“Problems have arisen because Government was neither bold not quick. Because of the way Andhra had come about, he said, the impression was gaining that it was very difficult to make the Government move from status quo unless it was compelled, and the way it was compelled in this case was dangerous for the good of the country. It was said the Andhra Bill would not have come out but for the hungerstrike of an individual and the violence that followed it. Yielding to this kind of pressure and violence was the worst thing for a Government to do because it would encourage violence in future.
– From The Indian Express – Aug 18, 1953

Another leader from the Socialist Party, KB Menon, said these historic words
Andhra State was born in the womb of violence because the Central Government had not the imagination to grant it in time.”
From – The Indian Express – March 14, 1953
While history is thus, Seemandhra leaders referring the Telangana agitation as separatist and violent is nothing but pot calling the kettle black. Seemandhra people led one of the first and most violent statehood struggles in independent India. Yet, they try to belittle the Telangana movement shamelessly.
We do not support violence of any kind. Nor are we criticizing our Andhra counterparts for what has happened during the Andhra statehood struggle. Our intention in bringing out these facts is only to expose the hypocritical nature of Seemandhra leadership.

Related Articles

14 Responses

  1. Pingback: Check the following facets : Andhra Leak… « Telangana Wall

  2. Pingback: wow….. « Telangana Wall

  3. naveen says:

    I think ur site needs to get much more publicity….the people has to know the truths….continue the good work bro..

  4. prashanth k says:

    Astonishing facts…more and more need to know these facts..keep the gud work going…

  5. madhav says:

    Good Information brother, keep it up.

  6. dharam raj says:

    nice to know the history of telangana , and how it was forced into andhra.
    people should read this article to know more about telangana

    • Abhimanyu says:

      Fazal ali commission reported against joining but telangana is merged with andhra with a 2/3 majority of hyderabad state assembly. Of sourse andhra leaders are keen on getting a state capital taht’s worthy to be called a capital after losing madras. So ireally am not getting whose fault is this? The same applies even now when injustice is being done to telangana people all these years, where are it’s elected leaders and trust me they are significantly represented in state and national assemblies. I really don’t think the failure of andhra pradesh can be attributed to a common man living in andhra who for everyone’s information worries about his own belly is being enough screwed by his own leaders already. So better this blog admit that there leaders over the time has been not sincere to the people and blame them the most rather than common andhra junta. If not for hyd people of andhra don’t have a damn with telangana , So solution simple discussion on these issues and might be sahring hyd till andhra’s get a separate capital for themselves. Peace 🙂

      • Viswaroop says:


        1) There was never any voting in Hyderabad assembly about merger. If you claim so, please furnish records.

        2) Hyderabad assembly with members from kannada, marathi regions cannot decide the fate of Telangana region. That is the reason Fazal Ali recommended to wait untill next elections.

        3) Telangana people elect telangana leaders, but they are selected by Andhra leaders who hold power. Jagan case is an example of how ministers are controlled by chief minister.

        4) We agree that elected representatives, ministers from Telangana have not done enough, but we cannot change their efficiency as long as Andhra big fellows are calling the shots.

  7. 1245Sam says:

    Nice info bro…keep posting…

  8. Sai says:

    I am not against Andhra people. But please clarify a small doubt of mine. When KCR fasted in 2009 for seperate Telangana, everyone commented that is fasting by taking fluids in background.

    Did Potti Sriramulu live for 58 days without anything (i mean is it really called fasting) ???

  9. Dranarasimhudu says:

    Potti aslo taken fluids

  10. M. P. Rao says:

    Yes, Sreeramulu died during the night of 15–16 December 1952. Only one person before him in modern Indian history, Jatin Das (, actually fasted to death; all the others either gave up or were arrested and force fed or hospitalised. Both did have done their ‘fast-onto-death’ in true Gandhian way, that is without taking any food, whatsoever and a little water to help prevent dehydration and instant death.

    Andhra State was announced by the Nehru Government, with ‘Madras’ remaining to be the Capital of residual state of Madras – on the 50th day of “fast” and for that reason Sreeramulu continued his fast till died on the 58th. Day of his “fast”.

    As for Emotional People of Andhra Region led by Communists – as discussed by that foreign correspondent and largely by even Indian correspondents of the day were all fearful of Communist led Soviet Union (former USSR, now disintegrated) the one of the two super powers (the other being USA), post II World War.

    India has been the only country which allowed even Communists to participate in Elections and form governments (the first such government being 1957–59 and then again in 1967–69 in Kerala led by E. M. S. Namboodiripad. This was followed by the states of West Bengal & Thripura).
    To speak truth, Communists also let ‘”Telangana People’s Armed Struggle, 1946-1951’ (, which was also violent.

    So to claim Telengana People or Andhra People are violent is not correct.

    Both 1969 Telengana Agitation and 1972 Andhra Agitation had been peaceful on the part of Agitators, while there had been, sadly many suicides on both side as well as deaths in the police firing.

  11. aditya says:

    Dear Mr.Rao,
    It is good that this has attracted your attention at least after 3 years of its posting.But,we are not able to comprehend what you are trying to say to us in your comment.Do you mean to say the death of 4500 men and women of telangana in an armed struggle for liberation from Nizam and 1200 suicides of telangana youth for implementation of 9 December 2009 declaration of telangana in parliament are the same as the looting and rioting of Andhra people on that fateful day?
    If it is so, we would like to say it is a ludicrous comparison.Please don’t compare martyrs with rioters.It does not sound or taste good.

  12. Pingback: Facts About Potti Sriramulu’s Fast Unto Death: History Distorted? Every Teluguite Must Read This! | Suntosh Haudakar

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *